Friday, August 26, 2005

More from the MadTrad Desk

This might just be the funniest thing I've ever seen..... For those who think that B16 is a heretic liberal, this is your guy. This is the guy who was elected by his mom and then-girlfriend. Then again, as many of our commentors like to play Pope, I'm sure this resonates in some quarters.

And that's the amazing thing about everyone who's panting to roll out the red carpet for anti-Semitic schismatics. For all the daily screaming about MahonyChurch, the radical American bishops, heretic liberals, blah, blah, blah, isn't it ironic that the great church-splitting excommunicati of the last century were not post-Conciliar American progressives, not Piero Marini, not Bugnini nor Cardinals Martini or Daneels but Lefevbre, Fellay, Williamson and the "traditional" Society of St. Pius X?

Given the DPT (Decibel Per Trad) Index of these forums, it's a valid question.

-30-

7 Comments:

Blogger PiousPius said...

Wow!! Three consecutive screeds against "madtrads"! I guess Rocco is very loco about the meeting on Monday. He's trying to do everything in his diminutive power to tar all traditionalists before the meeting.

It is nice to beat those who are down, isn't it? Yes, let us beat them! Thos mad schismatics!

What a difference between "Pope" Rocco, almighty Judge of "MadTrads", and Pope Benedict, the one with the love and with the pen.

Why so much hatred, Rocco? What have the priests of SSPX ever done to you? Shouldn't you also be praying for a much-needed reconciliation?

I will be praying for you and for all your readers -- and please, let us all pray for the unity of the Church.

26/8/05 19:07  
Blogger rascalities said...

michigancatholic writes: "The time has come to be more careful about whom we beatify."

That "time" has always been there; this is not some recent development.

-Richard

26/8/05 21:55  
Blogger rascalities said...

For those who need a break (and are not humor-impaired), here's my favorite "Trad" site:

http://www.ancillapress.com/SSPI/SSPIindex.html

26/8/05 21:56  
Blogger Todd said...

Having a little fun at the expense of self-styled conservative Catholics, and all of a sudden it's a hate fest? Seems to me a little projection is going on.

Personally, I find it more than ironic; it's hilarious.

27/8/05 01:29  
Blogger michigancatholic said...

You bet it's a valid question. A traditionalist can't hiccup but what they're demonized....BUT a liberal can do virtually any damn thing they like and they're fine...no penalty.

And whether the bureaucrats do anything about it or whatever, we all know it's true. I could point to umpteen sites online but I'm too tired at the moment......and frankly, I think it's a waste of time--you've all seen them...

27/8/05 10:29  
Blogger patrick said...

"You bet it's a valid question. A traditionalist can't hiccup but what they're demonized....BUT a liberal can do virtually any damn thing they like and they're fine...no penalty."

That is a completely false statement, at least with respect to St. Blog's. I, for one, am glad that someone on St. Blog's writes from a point of view other than the traditionalist who stomps around in a rage. Rocco provides a desparately needed corrective, even if I do not always agree with him. The fact that certain comment-box trolls simply can't abide the fact that Rocco (and a few others like him) are willing to challenge the prevailing St. Blog's atmosphere tells us more about the combox detractors than Rocco.

27/8/05 14:04  
Blogger Pope Michael said...

Please check your facts about the July 16, 1990 election of Pope Michael. It is an insult to one of the electors to call her Pope Michael's girl friend. (You don't specify which elector). Also eight people were present at the election, not three as indicated.

29/8/05 11:47  

Post a Comment

<< Home