More from the MadTrad Desk
And that's the amazing thing about everyone who's panting to roll out the red carpet for anti-Semitic schismatics. For all the daily screaming about MahonyChurch, the radical American bishops, heretic liberals, blah, blah, blah, isn't it ironic that the great church-splitting excommunicati of the last century were not post-Conciliar American progressives, not Piero Marini, not Bugnini nor Cardinals Martini or Daneels but Lefevbre, Fellay, Williamson and the "traditional" Society of St. Pius X?
Given the DPT (Decibel Per Trad) Index of these forums, it's a valid question.
-30-
4 Comments:
michigancatholic writes: "The time has come to be more careful about whom we beatify."
That "time" has always been there; this is not some recent development.
-Richard
For those who need a break (and are not humor-impaired), here's my favorite "Trad" site:
http://www.ancillapress.com/SSPI/SSPIindex.html
Having a little fun at the expense of self-styled conservative Catholics, and all of a sudden it's a hate fest? Seems to me a little projection is going on.
Personally, I find it more than ironic; it's hilarious.
"You bet it's a valid question. A traditionalist can't hiccup but what they're demonized....BUT a liberal can do virtually any damn thing they like and they're fine...no penalty."
That is a completely false statement, at least with respect to St. Blog's. I, for one, am glad that someone on St. Blog's writes from a point of view other than the traditionalist who stomps around in a rage. Rocco provides a desparately needed corrective, even if I do not always agree with him. The fact that certain comment-box trolls simply can't abide the fact that Rocco (and a few others like him) are willing to challenge the prevailing St. Blog's atmosphere tells us more about the combox detractors than Rocco.
Post a Comment
<< Home